PhD Defence by Sebastian Amrhein


Sebastian Amrhein works as a researcher and lecturer in the Programme for Sustainable Tourism at the Rhine-Waal University of Applied Sciences in Kleve, Germany, just across the border, a few kilometres away from Nijmegen. He successfully defended his PhD Thesis at the Radboud University Nijmegen, entitled Beyond overtourism. An analysis of (non-)protest against touristification on the Balearic Island of Mallorca (click on cover page to download the full text) on December 16, 2025.

The main Supervisor of his PhD Thesis was Prof. Gert-Jan Hospers from Radboud University and Director of “Stad en Regio“, a foundation focused on scientific consultancy for local governmental organisations, and at the same time also Senior Researcher at the University of Ostrava, Czech Republic and Guest Professor at the Centre for Netherlands Studies at the University of Münster in Germany. With the broad expertise and international orientation of Prof. Gert-Jan Hospers, Sebastian could not have had a better Supervisor. The co-supervisors, Prof. Dirk Reisser of Rhine-Waal University of Applied Sciences and I, played only a minor role. It was, however, Sebastian’s own critical approach within the field of research on overtourism which was the main driving force behind this PhD research:

The slogan “Help – the tourists are coming,” used at a 2011 community meeting in Berlin, marked the early stages of public resistance to the increasing negative impacts of mass tourism. Since then, protests against ‘overtourism’ have expanded. In recent years, mass demonstrations in the Canary and Balearic Islands have called for a fundamental shift in the dominant growth-oriented tourism model, aligning with the principles of the degrowth movement.

However, the Covid-19 crisis, in which overtourism during the lockdown was overtly not an issue anymore, also showed that tourism can not be looked at in isolation, as the fundamental societal problems behind overtourism still remained. Overtourism, therefore, is not just an issue of ‘managing tourism’ but needs to be analysed from a broader societal perspective.

Sebastian Amrhein critically examined the potential for transformation within global tourism by analysing the sector through the lens of these more fundamental power structures and social inequalities, from the perspective of degrowth theory. Structured around three interrelated sub-projects, the research explores how overtourism impacts residents, why many do not engage in protest despite dissatisfaction, and whether local initiatives like Cittaslow can serve as viable degrowth placemaking strategies.

The first sub-project investigates whether overtourism can lead to fundamental shifts in residents’ worldviews. Drawing on Mezirow’s Transformative Learning Theory (1997), the study finds that overtourism can indeed lead to profound personal transformation, particularly among older individuals who have witnessed long-term changes in their environment. For them, experiences of environmental degradation, overcrowding, and social disruption led to a reassessment of tourism and capitalist economic models. Conversely, younger individuals lacked a comparative baseline and viewed these conditions as normal, often expressing disengagement or negative views of tourism without undergoing a transformative shift. The concept of shifting baselines is introduced to explain generational differences in perception, highlighting the importance of lived experience and memory in shaping critical awareness.

The second sub-project explores why many residents refrain from participating in protests against overtourism. Sebastian Amrhein identified structural inequalities, economic dependency, and social habitus as key barriers to activism. Many respondents, particularly those from lower socio-economic classes or informal tourism employment, feared social exclusion, economic loss, or lacked awareness of the movements altogether. In contrast, protest participants were largely from the middle class, with prior experience in activism. The study applies Bourdieu’s theory of practice (2013) to demonstrate how social position and cultural capital shape individuals’ capacity and willingness to engage in political action. Misinformation and media narratives were also shown to influence public perception, often delegitimising protest movements by framing them as irrational or xenophobic. This supports the claim that discursive power is used by dominant actors to maintain the status quo.

In a third sub-project Sebastian Amrhein analyses Cittaslow as a potential degrowth initiative. By comparing Cittaslow’s principles with Latouche’s eight Rs of degrowth (2009) and conducting a case study in Artà, Mallorca, he found significant conceptual overlap but also notable differences. While Cittaslow emphasises local well-being, sustainability, and cultural preservation, it lacks the radical critique of economic structures central to degrowth. Its open-ended nature allows for both promotional and transformative interpretations, depending on local political will. The study highlights the flexibility of Cittaslow as a strength but also a risk, as its impact is contingent on leadership priorities rather than embedded systemic change. Furthermore, both Cittaslow and degrowth lack detailed implementation guidelines, complicating their translation into effective policy.

Across all three sub-projects, the thesis challenges simplified narratives in tourism research, particularly the assumption that economic benefit equates to support for tourism. It reveals that tourism’s impacts are deeply interwoven with broader social dynamics and that resistance or acceptance is shaped by class, dependency, generational experience, and access to discourse. The findings call for a more nuanced, critical, and justice-oriented approach in tourism studies, one that moves beyond economic metrics to consider power relations and transformative possibilities.

Ultimately, Sebastian Amrhein could confirm that tourism is not merely a sector to be managed but a social field that both reflects and reinforces existing inequalities. Meaningful transformation, therefore, requires more than local initiatives; it demands structural critique, inclusive discourse, and the political will to reimagine development beyond growth.

References
Bourdieu, P. (2013) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Latouche, S. (2009) Farewell to growth. Polity Press, Cambridge.
Mezirow, J. (1997) Transformative Learning: Theory to Practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education. No. 74, pp. 5-12.

PhD Defence by Veronica Pastorino

On Monday, Nov. 24, 2025, Veronica Pastorino successfully defended her PhD Thesis entitled: “Spatial Citizenship. Understanding the challenges and redefinitions of contemporary social cohesion through the analysis of the geographies of post-migrant contentious politics(click on cover page to download full text). Through this defence, she did not just earn the PhD title from the Radboud University in Nijmegen, but also from the University of Bologna, as part of the Double Degree Programme between both Universities.

The long title of this PhD thesis reflects the ambitious and complex setup of the underlying PhD research, which might need some clarification:

The PhD Thesis focuses on how second-generation youngsters with a migration background, also called ‘migrants’ descendants’, gain citizenship in their new home country. Following the seminal work of the Citizenship scholar Engin Isin, Veronica suggests that this is much more than just a formality. It is not so much related to their judicial status, although,that is of course also part of it, but more related to becoming a full-fledged member of the host society and community, as well as to how others recognise them as such. It is much more a multiscalar ‘practice’ and a ‘process’. Citizenship emerges out of what political actors and ‘citizens’ do… This already makes it clear that it is not just an issue of nationality or of the nation-state, but also of the local and regional communities in which they are active. This brings in the dimension of space (or place). Identification with and belonging to a specific place can occur at different spatial scale levels. The way one might gain this kind of ‘citizenship’ can also vary from one place to another.

Veronica investigated the processes of how these youngsters gain citizenship in their new home surroundings in two different countries, Germany and Italy. In both countries, she looked at specific social movements, or one could roughly also say: specific ‘NGO’s’, which intend to support these youngsters in gaining citizenship. These social movements in both countries operate on a national as well as on a regional/local level, reflecting also the different spatial scale levels of identification, belonging and (social) cohesion.

To conceptualise the complex spatiality of these processes, Veronica adopts and adapts the triad coined by Henri Lefebvre comprising Perceived Space (the more material and physical characteristics of space), Conceived Space (the conceptual and mental transposition of space) and Lived Space (the embodied and personally experienced aspects of space).

So Veronica tried to grasp the complexity of gaining citizenship based on individual and social actions, as well as on the individual and collective activities of these different social movements operating in different national and societal and political contexts.

Gaining citizenship is not an easy thing, and goes along with resistance and conflict and therefore can be described as a real ‘struggle’. This also demands critical reflection on how this actually takes place and might be improved. If it utterly looks as if it occurs smoothly and peacefully, there would be no reason to seek alternative ways of dealing with it, even though the underlying problems might still be there. Veronica, therefore, also concludes that some degree of irritation and conflict is actually needed to make critical reflection on these processes and ‘learning’ from errors effective.

In this way, her research attempts to contribute to societal and political debates as well as to scientific debates in the fields of European Postmigration Studies, Social Movement Studies and Citizenship Studies by adding a critical spatial lens to it.

  

PhD Defence by Joren Jacobs

The Netherlands are renowned because of their Spatial Planning and their institutionalised System of Spatial Planning. Something many Spatial Planners in the Netherlands are very proud of. This does not make them the most critical or progressive branch in Dutch governance. On the other hand, in the last decade, the actual practice of spatial planning in the Netherlands has changed quite a bit. Under the influence of the changing political climate, austerity programmes in the disguise of decentralisation to provincial and municipal levels of governance, Spatial Planning was increasingly marginalised and suffering from a lack of resources and of effective instruments. In practice, Spatial Planners were struggling to find new ways and alternative modes to ‘do’ Spatial Planning. One might say that this enforced a certain dynamics or ‘progressiveness’ in Spatial planning. In an earlier PhD thesis I supervised on ‘informality in Spatial Planning’ and in another blogpost on the ‘Culture of Spatial Planning’, this was also addressed.

In this respect, it is refreshing to view Spatial Planning and its dynamics from a totally different perspective, in which not only the spatial setting and the object of spatial planning are problematised but also the practice and institutional setting, as well as the self-awareness and ‘identity’ of Spatial Planning itself are rethought.

This is exactly what Dr Joren Jacobs did in his PhD Thesis on Cross-border Spatial Planning in World Society. A systems-theoretical perspective (Click on the Image of the Cover to download the full text).
While strictly sticking to the System Theoretic perspective of Niklas Luhmann (for a brief introduction in Luhmann’s Systems Theory, see this brief video) Joren shows how a System of Cross-Border Spatial Planning does not easily evolve and needs to deal with the (new) limitations and opportunities of boundaries to be effective while causing the whole System of Spatial Planning to change and adapt and to re-define itself.  Looking less at the strategic actions of decision makers or planners but rather at the inherent logics of systemic dynamics and interactions between different subsystems, it shows new avenues of how cross-border landscapes and interactions take shape. This new theoretical conceptualisation of (cross-border) Spatial Planning links nicely to Complexity Theories and Assemblage Theories of Spatial Planning, even though in specific aspects it is also radically different.

On Wednesday, Nov. 12, 2025, Joren Jacobs, supported by his Paranymphs, Dr Daan Boezeman and Dr Henk-Jan Kooij, successfully defended his PhD thesis before a panel of five distinguished examinors consisting of Prof. Sander Meijerink, Prof. Marc Redepenning, Prof. Angelique Chettiparamb, Prof Raoul Beune and Assoc. Prof. Martijn Duineveld.

 

 

Alma Mater

Alma Mater is the Latin term for one’s former school or institution of formation, the ‘mother who nourished us intellectually’.  In my case, I did not follow any of the schools or universities I visited from beginning to end. So what is my Alma Mater? I started my academic schooling at the University of Groningen, to which I still feel very attached. But my academic career really started at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technolgy in Zurich (‘Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich’ (ETHZ)’), where I did my PhD, and worked for almost 17 years as what we now would call an ‘assistant professor’ and ‘associate professor’, until I was appointed as full professor at the Radboud University in Nijmegen in 1998. It is at the ETH where my real intellectual interests and inspiration were ignited. So I guess, that justifies, that I call it my Alma Mater.

The ETH is an exceptionally high-esteemed research university, with a strong intellectual heritage, exemplified by e.g. 21 Nobel Prize laureates until 2019. It is about as large as the Radboud University in Nijmegen in student numbers, but has a budget of almost 2 billion Euros every year (Radboud has a budget of a bit less than 700 million Euros). This provides a lot of space for free curiosity-driven scientific explorations and debate. I still very well remember the extended lunches with PhD candidates and colleagues, where we spontaneously discussed whatever was topical at that time, and where we jointly ‘solved’ many world problems 🙂  The perfect breeding ground for my burgeoning intellectual interests.

It is a bit of a coincidence, that I will be able to end my academic career (I will get the status of emeritus, next summer, 2024), with a research stay from March 2024 onward, at my former Alma Mater in Zurich. During this research stay, I will serve as a senior fellow at the Collegium Helveticum at the ETH in Zurich. Although this is just a coincidence, it gives the feeling that this rounds the circle.

The Collegium Helveticum is an Institute for Advanced Study. It is jointly supported and operated by the ETH Zurich, the University of Zurich and the Zurich University of the Arts. It is dedicated to transdisciplinary research and acts as a joint think tank or a forum for dialogue between academics, the aim of which was to promote mutual understanding between the natural sciences and technology on the one hand, and the humanities and social sciences on the other. Currently, the fellowship programme of the Collegium Helveticum focuses on «Epistemologies of Aesthetic Practices», along with some individual inter- and transdisciplinary projects on selected topics. My current research on ‘the affective or aesthetic aspects of urban places’ fits nicely into this programme. But is certainly is also a challenge and joy to explain one’s neo-phenomenological approach to colleagues from disciplines like particle physics or medical sciences, etc. …

The Collegium Helveticum is housed in the former observatory designed by the famous architect and ETH professor for architecture, Gottfried Semper (1803–1879), and was extensively restored in 1997. It is an iconic building, at the centre of the ETH and University campus, with seminar and exhibition rooms, located close to the largest scientific libraries of Switzerland.

Privacy Preference Center

Necessary

Advertising

Analytics

Other