PhD Defence Iris Poelen

Within one week two PhD candidates defended their PhD Thesis on topical issues related to Migration, Citizenship, Integration and ‘Homemaking’. On Friday, February 14 it was the turn of Iris Poelen.

She successfully defended her PhD thesis ‘Home in Displacement. Syrian and Eritrean women’s negotiations of home in the Dutch nation-space’ in front of a panel of very renowned experts in this specific field consisting of Dr Rianne van Melik (Radboud University Nijmegen), Prof.  Betty de Hart (Free University Amsterdam), Prof. Paolo Boccagni (Università di Trento, Italy), Dr Ilse van Liempt (University of Utrecht), Prof. Jan-Willem Duyvendak (University of Amsterdam). (click on picture to download full thesis)

Her thesis was supervised by Prof. Huib Ernste and Dr Lothar Smith and Dr Jana Vyrastekova.

This very clear and well-written thesis centres on the stories of forty-five Syrian and Eritrean women who have been forcibly displaced. Having fled from different ordeals relating to war and persecution, these women arrived in the Netherlands during the refugee protection crisis of 2015. As they sought to (re)make home, they worked to (re)shape their social networks, (re)create their livelihoods and pursued other personal components important for feeling at home. However, Dutch research reports showed that women held a more vulnerable societal position than men and stressed a need for more research on Syrian and Eritrean women’s experiences in the Netherlands from their own perspectives.

Theoretically, the thesis builds on scholarship that has criticised ‘integration’ as a scientific- and policy paradigm, for the integration concept wrongfully frames groups of people as external to society (Schinkel, 2018). Scholars present ‘homemaking’ as a productive alternative lens that overcomes integration’s flaws but retains its merits (Boccagni & Hondagneu-Sotelo, 2023). Contrasting common notions of home as a fixed place, scholars of the ‘migration-home nexus’ (Boccagni, 2016) suggest that home can travel through time, space and scales and argue that home is best understood as a process. Homemaking furthers understanding of how people rearrange relations to prior sites of significance, while simultaneously negotiating home in present structures.

The thesis challenges the conventional understanding of displacement as an experience in which home is necessarily lost forever and underscores the relevance of multi-local and processual understandings of home. Syrian and Eritrean women who have been displaced, continuously (re)make home in the Netherlands. The thesis shows that supportive infrastructures for displaced persons could foster their comfort, by helping them (re)create roles and routines that sustain a sense of self, and by acknowledging that memories of past home places can be important for illuminating and transforming the present. However, the Dutch integration policies – with their fixed notion of home as rooted in the national territory – also further processes of ‘othering’ and protecting ‘our’ home,  inflicting great discomfort on these ‘others’ seeking new homes after displacement.

These migration-related policies may continue to affect ‘migrant’ women long after they have formally been accepted into the nation-space. Opposing the Dutch government’s aim to foster ‘migrant’ women’s ‘self-determination’, ‘a gendered politics of discomfort’ impedes these women’s pursuit of their needs and wishes in the Netherlands. Dutch immigration- and integration policies may lock women in ‘path dependencies’, reinforce their dependence on male partners, produce their ‘gender-specific guilt’, incite their ‘role-breakdown’ and inflict symbolic violence. Despite these challenges, women demonstrate their agency in (re)making home, albeit through different expressions. For younger women, the Dutch government offers important homemaking opportunities that allow them to give shape to their lives as they wish. Yet for women who already had established families and careers, but lost these important relations and roles in displacement, homemaking may instead involve a constant struggle for emplacement. The stories provided by a previously unheard group of Syrian and Eritrean women in the Netherlands illuminate how the dream of a national home can unsettle human lives.

References

Boccagni, P. (2016) Migration and the search for home: Mapping domestic space in migrants’ everyday lives. Springer, New York.

Boccagni, P. & Hondagneu‐Sotelo, P. (2023) Integration and the struggle to turn space into “our” place: Homemaking as a way beyond the stalemate of assimilationism vs transnationalism. International Migration. 61(1), 154-167.

Schinkel, W. (2018) Against ‘immigrant integration’: for an end to neocolonial knowledge production. Comparative Migration Studies. 6(1), 31.

PhD Defence of Mohamed Munas

On November 6, 2023, Mohamed Munas, working at the CEPA The Centre for Poverty Analysis, a Sri Lankan think-tank promoting a better understanding of poverty-related development issues, successfully defended his PhD thesis on “Reconnections”: Complexities of diaspora engagement in post-war Sri Lanka. If you click on the cover of his thesis you can download the full text.

During the civil war in Sri Lanka, many people left the country but supported and kept in close contact with their former communities, which sometimes represented a certain side of the conflict. After peace returned to the country, these relationships changed. Sometimes redirecting the support to other or less distinct communities and sometimes also reproducing breaks and divisions, both in the diaspora- as well as in the ‘home’ communities. This sparked the main research question of this PhD thesis: How does collective diasporic transnationalism influence the sustainability and stability of the recovery process in post-war Sri Lanka? 

This research views diasporic transnational practices as a large social phenomenon and situates them in a broader practice theory framework, especially within the Schatzkian concept of site ontology, to understand the multi-sited transnational diaspora activity and the social connections between different sites of performance. This research contributes to both policy and academic discourses on spatial and temporal elements of diaspora engagement in post-war societies. The affection and belongingness that diasporas possess with communities in places of origin led to complex forms of interactions at multiple sites and also questioned and developed further the concept of diasporic communities. The research finds that transnational diaspora engagement practices are bundled with wider social, and contextual dynamics at play linked to multiple sites evaluated. They therefore contribute to multi-sited and transnational processes of ‘placemaking’.

Mohamed Munas was challenged by the opponents during the defence, but very sovereignly responded to, and in some cases also thoroughly deconstructed the questions posed. A great defence and a well-deserved degree.

Below, you get an impression of the typical PhD Defence procedures at Radboud University.

   

PhD Defence of Lidya Sitohang

On Tuesday, March 22, Lidya Sitohang (Co-supervised by Dr Lothar Smith and Dr Martin van der Velde) successfully defended her PhD thesis on ‘Cross-border interaction in the context of development in the Indonesian-Malaysian border region’. A thesis in which she nicely shows, that places are more than just ‘bordered’ regions and that in these places, people are making a living and in their everyday cross-border interactions are the source for development of the region. Also, these examples of everyday border crossings show again that we as human beings are always already beyond our own borders. An issue which I regularly refer to also on this blogsite, both in theoretical and philosophical terms as well as in more empirical terms. Especially her subtitle beautifully expresses the embodiment of cross-border interaction: ‘Garuda is on my chest, but my stomach is in Malaysia’.

To quote her summary (click on picture to the right to download the full PhD Thesis): ‘This study investigates the border crossing of Krayan’s locals into Malaysia as a means of meeting their daily needs, which cannot be met in Krayan because of the poor state of development of the region. People living in the more central areas of Indonesia tend to regard the Krayan locals’ border crossing into Malaysia as a sign of decreasing loyalty, and hence a lack of nationalistic pride, towards the State of Indonesia. In contrast, the Krayan locals feel that their sense of nationalism and loyalty to the State of Indonesia is proven through their persistent wish to live in an area at the very edge of the country’s territory, regardless of the lack of development in Krayan. Living on the border with Malaysia, the locals see themselves as guardians of the sovereign territory of the Republic of Indonesia. Another factor is that in Krayan border crossing has long been part of life and existed prior to the formation of the two states. Crossing the border into Malaysia continues to be a matter of visiting family members, where ‘family’ includes all individuals who have a common cultural background and live on either side of the border. Also, as the respondents explained, the poor development in the region forces them to go to Malaysia and this does not compromise their loyalty to the State of Indonesia. The locals mentioned the expression Garuda di dadaku, tapi Malaysia di perutku (Garuda is on our chest, but our stomach is Malaysia), which aptly depict that they hold Indonesia in their hearts even though their livelihoods are supported by Malaysia’ (p. 260).

Even though the Covid-19 crisis slowly but surely does not restrict us in our travelling behaviour and our ‘border crossings’ her defence also showed that this kind of research is still very much needed for the rethinking of the way we deal with borders, as the Dutch Immigration and Naturalisation Service (IND) did not grant her the Visum to defend her thesis live at the University in Nijmegen, 🙁
although especially academic research should by principle be borderless.

But we keep working on it…